Down to Earth

Science and engineering of natural systems

Tuesday, May 16, 2006

Life and landforms

Life’s tough. I don’t mean winning the World Series or getting a PhD, tough though they are. I mean living organisms. They’ve evolved in a capricious world, neighbour competing against neighbour for that speck of sunlight or this drop of water. They’ve adapted to their environment, and in turn the environment, too, has evolved. Atmospheric chemistry is a prime example. What keeps our aerobic metabolism chugging along is the waste stream of other organisms. But cast your gaze down to Earth, to the hills and valleys. Is there a telltale sign of life in the landforms that adorn the Earth, or in the evolution of these landforms?


“No. Well, maybe. Well, give us some money and we’ll find out.” This is how Bill Dietrich and Taylor Perron of U.C. Berkeley answered the question in Nature. There are no characteristic landforms where you can say, “Life did that.” Hills are hills, and valleys are valleys. Some have suggested that rivers would not meander as they do if not for the riparian vegetation holding their banks in place, and yet we see meanders on Mars. Instead, life changes more subtle characteristics of landforms – like their steepness or smoothness. Hilltops are round, but even rounder with a mantle of vegetation.

Plants and animals can alter the way landforms develop by changing the rules of how rock and regolith move about the place. Worms churn up the soil (hat-tip to Chuck Darwin); prone grass protects soil from being eroded; tree roots anchor soil into bedrock, while at the same time wedging the bedrock apart. These effects are most readily apparent when they're removed. If a wildfire burns a grassy slope, erosion picks up. In fact it may have been erosion following the wholesale collapse of terrestrial ecosystems in the end-Permian that led to the parallel mass extinction in marine ecosystems. Massive soil erosion brings with it nutrients and, if great enough, disruption of aquatic ecosystems through eutrophication.

Humans are also part of this “life”. We’ve dug one serious trench from the Atlantic to Pacific, and have built great pyramids (though probably not in Europe). We plow up fields and cut down trees, causing erosion and landslides. But we also replant trees to stop erosion, as China is doing on a grand scale (with dire effects for Japan’s chopsticks imports).

Life leaves its signature on the Earth’s landforms, written in the landforms’ longevity as much as their profile. Discovering this can be a real pleasure for geomorphologists, tough though it may be. I know. This is what I’ve been doing for my PhD, with only a few weeks left. Wish me luck.

Labels: ,


5 Comments:

At 11:27 AM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

"Is there a telltale sign of life in the landforms that adorn the Earth, or in the evolution of these landforms?"

Isn't this obvious?

Without vegetation, most landforms (except the ones of solid rock) would look different as a result of increased erosion (sometimes greatly increased).

Anyone who does not know this need merely look at a road cut where nothing was planted to hold the soil in place.

Another good example is the erosion that occurs when the crytogamic crust (living) is destroyed by off-road vehicles in the Soutwestern desert of the US. With nothing to hold the soil in place, erosion is quick and often severe (sometimes producing deep trenches where there once were none).

 
At 4:58 PM , Anonymous Daniel Collins said...

The test for a telltale sign is if I had two contour maps, one of a vegetated landscape and one of a barren landscape, and I had to identify which was which (without knowledge of climate, soil, etc). Could I identify them correctly? It's not actually so obvious.

Organic soil crusts are intriguing things. Their major contribution to the ecosystems where they exist is the fixing of nitrogen into the soils. But when off-road vehicles kill them, how much of the erosion is due to the lack of cryptogams or to the disturbance of the soil directly by the tyres? I don't know.

 
At 12:13 PM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

TO see the type of erosion that occurs on land forms with no vegetation present, one need only take a trip to the Badlands in SD or to southern Utah (Factory Butte, for example).

These are entirely different landforms that are covered by vegetation.

The question of whether there is a "telltale sign" of life is really not a very good one, scientifically speaking. It involves a human judgement.

A much more scientific question would be the following: Given two plots of land next to one another, one covered by vegetation and the other not, is there a difference in how they look after a period of time? The road cut example given above is very applicable here.


Also The role of cryptogams in preventing soil erosion has been studied and is well documented
http://www.cms.uhi.ac.uk/rgsmrg/belfastabstracts/gaskin.htm

 
At 11:07 AM , Anonymous KAM said...

Great stuff, Keep it up! I just bookmarked your blog. We have some deep gullies in our wood lot. However it used to be pasture. I have been wondering when they were created.

 
At 11:15 PM , Anonymous Daniel Collins said...

I've studied gullies a bit. I'll do a post on them sometime. Possibly the most pronounced gullies are the lavakas in Madagascar.

 

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home