Down to Earth

Science and engineering of natural systems

Friday, May 12, 2006

Afforestation erodes Japanese chopsticks

For some years now China has been engaged in a campaign to reduce erosion of its agricultural lands by planting trees. While this erosion has been exacerbated in the last century, it’s been going on for millennia. The Loess Plateau, which is drained by the Yellow River (yellow, because of all the silt it carries) is nick-named China’s Sorrow because of its frequent flooding. It floods so often because the silt it carries from time to time causes the river channel to shift suddenly (a process called avulsion). The costs of both reduced agricultural productivity and flood control are high, and so China is planting trees, as well as reducing the number of trees cut down. (Dust storms are also a problem.)

This afforestation program affects Japan because 97% of their disposable chopsticks come from China, which has slapped a 5% tax on the commodity. Chinese chopsticks exporters have lifted the costs further. Japanese importers are now looking for other sources of chopsticks, while some companies are either not being so generous in giving them out or are now using reusable plastic ones. (Wasn’t the development of chopsticks in the first place a response to resource constraints?)

Another consequence of this afforestation program that China should be concerned with is water supply. More trees means more transpiration, and less water for growing crops. The first cases I think of come from South Africa and Argentina, though no doubt the problem is much more wide spread. Afforestation may seem green, but it’s not all roses.

[August 9, 2006: Updated broken link.]

Labels: ,


3 Comments:

At 2:21 PM , Blogger Dano said...

Daniel, isn't the evapotranspiration issue balanced by the fact that the ET may create a higher RH and thus carry water vapor farther into the interior of the country?

Best,

D

 
At 9:57 PM , Anonymous Daniel Collins said...

What I meant to emphasise is that the trees would transpire more, and therefore the crops would have to transpire (and grow) less, because there is a finite amount of water in the soil. Total evapotranspiration would pick up too, which would be detrimental somewhat to those relying on groundwater or streamflow. Once the water’s in the air, it’s not so much a resource and you can’t count on it being available for crop growth elsewhere.

 
At 9:30 AM , Anonymous chris said...

I also wonder if an afforestation program is really the solution. I know that region in China has been undergoing a shift to a drier peroid over the last several thousands years. I think it may be nearing semi-arid. They may be able to get some trees to grow in non-riparian locations (I am thinking about trees planted on the great plains during the dust bowl), but grasses are the natural cover. Also, grasses can actually have lower erosion rates.

 

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home